BAZUUKULU BA BUGANDA RADIO INTERNET.COM 88.8/89.2

The appointing authority of the Bank Of Uganda Governor, is the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund and the European Union:

The financial logo of the Bank of Uganda

4 November, 2018
 
By International  Media network 
 
It is known in certain circles that 3 appointments are NOT appointed by President Museveni of Uganda under the GLB 'free market' economy.
 
These jobs are the Speaker, the BOU Governor, and the IGG.
  
The BOU is just a dummy working on the GLB orders which insisted that ALL indegenous banking must be removed from the UG market economy model.
 
All the closed banks were closed irregularly, by the BOU, using the ignorance of the UG population about banking practice, and a hint of force.
 
From Teefe bank in 1989, to the Greenland Bank up  to the Mbabazi bank in the 2000's  Uganda's indegenous banks were closed irregularly and forcefully by BOU. 
 
On each and every occasion the govt regulations and PAPERWOK which BOU as the supervisory bank should have followed in closing a running commercial bank, were NOT followed.
 
The IGG whose role is to report on the BOU, or Govt failures is also directly appointed and paid by the WB/GLB.
 
Both Mutebile and Muwanga have been in their respective jobs for 25+ years and are paid directly from WB. 
 
The  BOU has over the years closed these banks with armed soldiers manning the doors. 
 
Customer monies in the bank were not returned to them and the individual bank assets were often stolen by BOU and UG govt officials. 
 
On most occasions BOU employees and powerful poltical figures would even steal the deposits of the customer, and assets they had pledged for loans.
 
This gross corruption at BOU was known to Sudhir and his Crane Bank. 
The Mbabazi bank was liquidated and the assets given to Crane Bank.
 
Sudhir used the gross corruption at BOU to run an unsupervised bank which was laundering money on an international scale, for years.
 
Crane bank in fact became the de-facto central bank (instead of BOU), as other commercial banks held accounts in Crane bank, something not allowed in any other banking system.
 
When Crane Bank had to be shut down, by the WB/IMF masters. they ordered the BOU to wind up Crane Bank and transfer the banks previously I'll gotten assets to DFCU bank.
 
It is Sudhir Ruparella who is now taking on the BOU.  
He has bribed his way through the UG govt to bring on this probe.
 
By bringing a case to show how all other banks were irregularly, and corruptly closed by a very corrupt BOU, the BOU will have to bring out details of the recent closure of equally corrupt Crane Bank.
 
Sudhir is hoping that after Ugandans  salivate about how BOU/GLB deliberately suffocated African owned banks in UG,  
they will not be averse to accepting that Crane Bank was also 'injured'  and accept the millions which UG tax payers will pay Sudhir Ruparella for the damage. 
Despite Sudhir stealing a lot of real estate in Kampala which he wants back too.
 
It is not Mutebille as such who is in trouble, he is a well paid dummy for the GLB who have been running the shambles called Uganda.
It is Sudhir is taking on the GLB .
 
 
 
 
 

The government of Uganda is looking for economic trouble by taking on Chinese loans anyhow: 

China money.  President Museveni (centre)  with

China money. President Museveni (centre) with Chinese engineers and Ministry of Energy officials after touring one of the tunnels (in background) at Karuma Hydro Power Project on August 23. The project is sponsored by a loan from China. FILE PHOTO.  

Growing infrastructural development in much of Sub-Saharan Africa has become closely connected to China in recent years. 
Construction of major infrastructure work is largely controlled by Chinese companies, who even negotiate loans on behalf of governments from China Banks at commercial interest rates. The conditionality for these loans is that the works shall be done by Chinese companies.

Uganda is a typical example of growing Chinese influence on the continent, running to China for most of its development needs. 
The China-Africa relationship leaves a lot to be desired. Many questions arise from this relationship - whether in the area of trade, investment, development aid, loans and educational scholarships.

These represent the multiplicity, diversity and complexity of the Chinese strategy on the continent, with potential pitfalls. 
It is puzzling, how deeply entrenched the roots of China and its footprints are being rapidly implanted at various levels on the continent.

It is not clear if African governments are prepared and in position to comprehend the depth of their ties with China and the implications for Africa’s future development. 
Watching from Uganda, it is difficult to imagine that there is any understanding of the nature of ties being weaved by China and government officials.

Yet, it has to be asked, is Uganda capable of regulating Chinese engagement in the country? What is the attraction to China’s otherwise very expensive loans to Uganda and other countries on the African continent?

Why Africa
What is the attraction for China to these otherwise very poor nations? What are the implications for freedom of choice for development priorities?
I will start with the first issue of regulation. It is evident that Uganda does not have the capacity to regulate China’ engagement within their jurisdiction. They have become beholden to China for the financing of expensive capital projects such as roads, power dams, optic fibres, among others.

Part of this is because of lack of accountability and transparency, which have led to accumulation of debt that is untenable from previous partners, much of it lost in corruption rather than what it is borrowed for. The Ugandan government and others on the continent do not, therefore, want to deal with the questions that arise out of effectiveness of loans taken before and fiscal austerity. As such, China becomes a partner that appears indifferent to these concerns and do not care about the track record of paying back and efficient utilisation of the borrowed resources and governance issues that is the obsession of Western donors and lenders.

No regulation
Through this mechanism, officials in government loose the moral authority to question the Chinese and to pay due diligence, rendering them incapable of providing adequate regulation. This is the real attraction for the Ugandan government to China’s expensive loans and technical support.

The second issue of what is the attraction to China’s otherwise expensive loans to Uganda and indeed most of Africa is that much of China’s engagement happens in an opaque manner, making it impossible for citizens to question choice of projects or demand value for money for these projects. Much of what happens is outside of the knowledge of citizens. In order to appreciate this, one must examine the manner in which China varies strategies, from trade to investment in various projects and to providing aid and loans simultaneously.

Within the infrastructural projects, there is evident transfer of technology and even human resources that happens in a clandestine manner. This secrecy complicates attempts to regulate China’s engagement but also limits Uganda’s choices. But one must also think about the role of the government or at least some of its actors, in possible connivance with the Chinese government.

President’s intention
President Museveni’s response to purported delays in clearing Chinese companies to operate in Uganda over scrutiny of tax exemptions are an indication of some of the things that remain unclear in this cooperation between China and Uganda.
While asking what the attraction to China’s expensive credit might be is important, it is also crucial to question what the attraction for China is to these otherwise poor countries, within the context of helping them. While it cannot be disputed that China is a huge economic power, it cannot be trusted, particularly its motives and methods.

It is not possible to imagine that China is simply trying to help a poor nation. What is clear is that China has moved from being a trade partner, which dominates trade anyway, to a key stakeholder in infrastructure development and lender to Uganda. What is the attraction? Of course, like colonialism’s simple allure, natural resources and minerals are the key attraction, let us make no mistake.

It is almost as if China is leading a fresh attempt at re-colonisation of Africa, moving beyond the neo-colonial narrative. China is thus using Africa’s governments, with a lot of hunger for personal accumulation of wealth, their desperate desire to cling to power and its own economic power to take advantage of these countries. 
With the guise of non-partisan involvement or no political interference, China is getting away with incredibly so much. The problem is, it is the African people that will be dispossessed by the ruling elite and political class, who are accomplices of China today.

The implications
As for the implications, these are numerous. Recent media reports about the takeover of a Zambian Corporation by China over the failure of the Zambian government to pay back some loans and the takeover of a port in Sri Lanka are just some of the beginning signs of what has been going on for years. It will not be surprising if China begins to control strategic ports in Africa. Much of these loans are far too expensive for developing countries to service effectively, which leaves such takeovers inevitable in future.

For example, a multimillion dollar project, which is mismanaged, poor quality work and lack of local content can be very dangerous for a country. Moreover, these loans are put in projects with limited capacity to deliver a high rate of return in the near future, with real impact for the poor of these nations. There is an urgent need to contextualise these loans and the potential for them turning into death traps for poor people.

Unless an honest attempt to operate with China in transparency and accountable way is cultivated, eliminating the current secrecy that surrounds much of what is done, then we can say we are courting crisis. There will be a generation of Ugandans that will have no idea how to redress any wrongs. There might be need to redefine our jurisdictions, if our independence and sovereignty is to be upheld in future.

Most importantly, we must look beyond the official narrative and what is obvious, to seek to understand the deeper meanings of China’s engagement in Uganda and Africa in general. What is sad, is that Africa is allowing China to shape the conversation on their economic development in what is clearly an unequal partnership from which only China stands to massively benefit in the long run, with limited possibility for socio-economic transformation of Uganda and other African countries.

Africans need to develop a sceptical attitude towards all these investments and development support, deeply engaging with it. While for China, this is a matter of hegemony and power, for Africa, it is a matter of life and death for the majority poor of its inhabitants.
Multinationals need to come to the aid of Africa to avoid the worst crisis in the nearby future.

Trap? China’s increasing influence through lending money that some countries cannot pay back, according to some analysts, has opened Africa to new challenges. Some analysts are calling it “debt-trap diplomacy” as such countries are forced into concessions when they default. For instance, according to the Centre for Global Development report, Sri Lanka, which holds about $1b in Chinese debt has been forced to surrender one of its ports to Chinese government-owned companies for a lease of 99-year.

Chinese investment in Uganda and Africa
Uganda is among the 20 countries on the African continent where China has massively invested. 
The Asian country, according to data from US-based research think tank – Brookings - is working on more than 89 projects shared between 45 Chinese companies. 
However, other East African countries such as Kenya and Tanzania hold much more in Chinese loans compared to Uganda. 
For instance, Kenya holds more than Shs19.2 trillion (($5.202b) in 137 projects worth of Chinese loans, while Tanzania currently has more than 149 projects funded by Chinese firms. 
Nigeria, South Africa, Zambia, Ethiopia and Egypt round off the list of five countries with the largest amount of Chinese loans. 
As of March 2018 Uganda held Shs14.6 trillion ($3.9b) in debt to the World Bank compared to China’s Shs6 trillion ($1.6b).

World Bank Vs China 
Loans from the World Bank or African Development Bank and China are differently structured. 
For instance, loans from the World Bank are structured as concessional and mostly carry a 10-year of grace period compared to those secured from Chinese which carry immediate interest rates. 
According to data from Alpha Capital, almost 50 per cent of loans from China are offered on commercial terms while the World Bank and International Development Association (IDA) provide concessional loans.

IDA loans are mostly earmarked for education, health and other social services while Chinese loans tend towards infrastructure projects such as roads, railways and power plants. 
The bulk of the Chinese loans have been directed towards infrastructure financing, especially in projects such as Karuma, Isimba and some national roads. 
China Exim Bank is one of the key agencies funding transport projects such as the Malaba-Kampala Standard Gauge railway, Kampala-Entebbe Express Highway and expansion of Entebbe International Airport.

Additional reporting by Eronie Kamukama

Nathan Nandala-Mafabi (MP) Uganda
Vice Chair, Board PNoWB/IMF

 

 

 

 

 

The Parliament of Uganda is not happy with the expenditures of the Ministry of Gender, Labour, Youth and Social Development:

October 24, 2018

Written by URN

Pius Bigirimana with Minister of State for Youth and Children Affairs Nakiwala Kiyingi

 

The Permanent Secretary Mr Pius Bigirimana with Minister of State for Youth and Children Affairs M/s Nakiwala Kiyingi

 

Parliament's Public Accounts Committee (PAC) yesterday tasked ministry of Gender, Labour and Social Development permanent secretary Pius Bigirimana to explain queries raised by the auditor general in his FY 2015/16 and 2016/17 reports.

Among the queries raised by the auditor general John Muwanga in the reports, is the existence ghost beneficiaries under the Youth Livelihood Programme (YLP) - noting that about 527 million of the fund money is non-traceable. The money was allegedly spent on ghost groups in 30 districts randomly sampled during the audit period.

Muwanga also raised concern in the 2015/16 financial year audit report that Bigirimana was compensated Shs 43 million for sustaining injuries in 2013 in the line of duty, yet police officers with claims dating back to 1996, have been put on the waiting list for all this time.

 

Appearing before the MPs, Bigirimana in his defense said the existence of ghost beneficiary groups should be directed to district accounting officers since payments are based on clearance by district authorities. He however, said he had taken note that, groups that collapsed or changed location and business direction after receiving funds had been captured as ghosts by the auditors.

"There were four categories; those that changed course of business; those that changed physical location, as well as groups that split immediately after formation and those that collapsed after their members got married," said Bigirimana.

According to the AG’s report, the Youth Livelihood Programme lacked a proper accountability framework or detailed guidelines for accountability of the revolving funds. Muwanga said that implementing entities under the programme accounted for funds differently, noting that this isn't only a recipe for improper accounting for funds, but also impedes comparability of accounting reports across the implementing entities.

According to the auditor general, overall recoverability of the funds as at 28th October, 2016 stood at Shs 5.5 billion - a paltry 39 per cent of the Shs 14.2 billion that was due for repayment by the beneficiaries. YLP was rolled out in 2014 and the first recovery was expected in 2016.

Bigirimana attributed the low recovery rate to the fact that the programme had just started and that many projects were yet to yield results, adding that those that ventured in agriculture were affected by drought and the Fall ArmyWorm.

Gaffa Mbwatekamwa, the Kasambya County MP tasked Bigirimana to explain the failure by his ministry to wipe out corrupt officials from the ministry and local government administration units who ask for kickbacks from the beneficiaries. Dorothy Azairwe Nshaija, the Kamwenge Woman MP also expressed concern about the failure by the ministry to sweep out ghost groups.

Masindi Woman MP, Jalia Bintu tasked Bigirimana to explain the steps being taken to ensure such incidents don't happen again. Bigirimana concurred with the legislators, saying that they have had such cases but argued that the MPs should also get involved since the program is comprehensive and involves district authorities.

He said that in Katakwi, the chairperson of Usuk LC III was arrested after he colluded with his own to defraud the fund of Shs 10 million. At least Shs 7 million was recovered. He said similar cases had been recorded in Gulu and other districts and that action had been taken.

On the irregularities in the issuance of workman compensation, the MPs noted with concern the unclear criteria for compensating government employees who suffer occupational injuries and other forms of hazards while at work. Masaka Municipality MP, Mathias Mpuuga tasked Bigirimana to explain the criteria used to pay workers who have been injured and who determines the dangers.

In his response, Bigirimana, said compensation is paid on first come first serve basis except where the situation is worse and dangerous. Asked to explain further, Bigirimana said priority is given to people who sent in their claims earlier, which are assessed by him as the PS and other committee members for payment.

Mpuuga insisted that there are complaints of unfair treatment and favouritism from unpaid workman claims, saying the matter shouldn't be disposed until Bigirimana presents approval details.

Bigirimana said there is a committee composed of the accountant, himself and the commissioner for labour that takes charge of handling claims and approving benefits. Masindi Woman MP, Jalia Bintu asked whether the ministry has got internal mechanisms where cases or complaints are handled.

"We have received cases of that nature and I have handled them myself, we have a formula of how we arrive at the compensation," said Bigirimana. He further said beyond himself, the medical board handles complaints and compensations.

The committee tasked Bigirimana to explain his 2013 compensation yet several police officers have not been paid since 1996 despite claiming smaller amounts. He explained that he was involved in a helicopter crash and sustained injuries.

"I was operated and that assessment was not done by me, it was by the ministry of Gender before I went there," Bigirimana said.

At the time, he was the permanent secretary in the Office of the Prime Minister (OPM). Ntungamo Municipality MP, Gerald Karuhanga put it to him that he used his office in OPM to call his colleagues in Gender to process his claim, a claim Bigirimana rejected.

Nb

One wants to understand why with such financial ineptitude on the part of this NRM government, this government is inviting in the rich to come and invest in this country without paying tax unlike the rest of the citizens of this country.

 

 

 

 

 

The President of Uganda is constantly being misled by his adviser over the environmental catastrophe faced by the people living on the African mountains of Elgoni in Eastern Uganda:

The President of Uganda camped in the volcanic mountains of Eastern Uganda

October 15, 2018

Written by URN 

President Yoweri Museveni of Uganda has apologized to the people of Bududa for the delays in the relocation of communities from mudslide prone areas. 

Museveni said that the delay was because he was misled by some people in government. However Museveni did not say how he was misled and by who.

The president was on Sunday speaking during a church service in memory of the Bududa mudslide victims, at Bukalasi secondary school playgrounds. Museveni said that following last Thursday's disaster, relocation is no longer debatable.

He said that cabinet will today Monday discuss the issue of relocating people to safer areas. Museveni also promised to give Shs 5 million to the families who lost their loved ones and Shs 2 million to the survivors. 

"I want to extend my condolences to the families who lost their dear ones and to those who were injured. I will send Shs 5m per family of the people who died and then send Shs 2m per family of the people who died but it will come through the chairman and the CAO, they are the ones who know." said Museveni. 

According to Uganda Red Cross Society (URCS), a total of 43 people lost their lives and 139 households with a population of 695 people were affected. Of these, 278 are children under 5 years. President Museveni also said that relocation is not by force and that those who are not willing to leave, houses will be  constructed for them in the safer trading centres.

"When we ordinary people come and say Were was wrong I will settle where the water should be. It is now unfortunately clear but after losing so many lives that that was not a wise decision." Museveni added. 
 
Willson Watira the LC V chairperson of Bududa told the president said that the residents are ready to relocate. He explained that the issue of politicians refusing people to relocate is now history.

"Stories have been going around indicating that people of Bududa have totally refused to be relocated…That was a story of the past, these people are ready to be relocated and even if you say we move now, am sure they can be your bodyguards." Watira said. 
 
The prime minister Ruhakana Rugunda said that lessons to learn from the incident is that whoever is involved in the process of relocation should speed up the process to avoid further loss of lives.

 

Nb

Indeed this long serving President is constantly being misled on how to spend taxpayer's money on almost any state item of expenditure! That is why this Poor African country is accumulating international debts that are proving impossible to pay back!

 

 

 

 

 

President Museveni of Uganda dishes out, Shs 3bn to city market middlemen(traders):

October 6, 2018

Written by URN

Museveni made several donations during his tour in downtown Kampala

Museveni made several donations during his tour in downtown Kampala city, Uganda

 

President Yoweri Museveni dished out more than Shs 3 billion to traders in downtown Kampala on Friday during his tour of the area. 

The donations are even likely to increase once the details of smaller Saccos are fine-tuned and submitted to the President's Office for consideration. Museveni promised the traders even more money and more goodies - literally promising to solve all the financial problems raised by the traders.

This was Museveni's first tour of downtown since the commencement of elective politics in 1996, almost 12 years after he assumed power. Museveni bluntly told traders that they had abandoned him by electing opposition politicians and he'd abandoned them in return. 

 

Who got what? 

Museveni visited six groups during the the tour that started at about midday and ended at 7:00pm. At Nakasero market where Museveni addressed the first rally, he donated Shs 100 million to the traders' main Sacco and promised a further Shs 10 million for each small Sacco. 

This reporter was told that there are over 20 smaller Saccos - meaning that the president will hand out more donations in excess of Shs 200 million. From Nakasero, Museveni proceeded to the Old Tax Park where he announced a donation of Shs 500 million to the taxi operators main Sacco. He also promised to donate Shs 10 million for each small Sacco. 

There are over 30 small Saccos, so Museveni will give out extra Shs 300 million to Old Taxi Park based Saccos. The president's third stopover was Owino market where he also donated Shs 500 million to the main market Sacco and promised another Shs 10 million to each small Sacco. The president was told that there are precisely 97 small Saccos, which will fetch Shs 970 million extra cash.

In Owino, the president promised to pay the Shs 4.5 billion debt that traders owe to DFCU bank. Government, he further promised, will help traders to develop the market. Museveni then headed to Qualicel Bus terminal where he met groups of traders from various arcades. He launched Kampala Acarders Advocacy Forum (KAAFO) Sacco and blessed it with a donation of Shs 100 million. 

Museveni further promised to fund 10 women from Kampala Women Traders Development Association (KAWODTA) who requested for financial support as they plan to go for a study trip in Turkey. 

Museveni's penultimate mini rally was at the market of disabled traders situated on the edge of New Taxi Park. Disabled traders under Kampala Association of Disabled Traders Company Limited are consumed and locked up in a land row. He didn't make any donations here. 

Kiseka market, the famed opposition arena, that has, for many years been seen as a fermentation ground for opposition protests in Kampala was where Museveni held his last rally. Throngs of people lined the aisles of Nakivubo road and cheered Museveni as he entered Kiseka. 

Here, Museveni donated Shs 250 million to each of the Saccos belonging to the two rival groups in the market. As at the preceding mini rallies, he promised Shs 5 million to each of the small Saccos in the area. He was told that that there are over 40 small Saccos in Kiseka.
 
Kampala politics
 
Museveni told traders that they decided to vote for opposition politicians first; Nasser Ntege Sebaggala, then John Ssebaana Kizito and now Erias Lukwago as city mayors. Museveni used various proverbs to explain Kampala's political dilemma.

For instance, Museveni referred to a Runyankore proverb at various rallies that goes; "amazi kugagira ngu otanyoga, oti nanye naba ntine nziro." This is loosely translated to mean that "when water rejects you, you in return say you had no dirt that warranted a shower."

To pronounce his return to downtown, Museveni referred to another Runyankore proverb which says; "ekyitita muhima tikyimaraho ente ze." This literally means that "what can't kills a cattle herder, can never kill all his cows."

Museveni said he had finally come to see people who have been politically rebellious for a long time. Museveni said traders should pardon him for abandoning them, but hastened to argue that they should also ask to be pardoned since they were the first to abandon him when Uganda opened the curtains for elective politics in 1996. 

Markets 
 
Museveni chided traders for electing "useless" politicians who later came to haunt them by selling markets to private investors and city tycoons. Museveni told traders at Nakasero market that politicians who they elected sold markets and never shared proceeds with them. 
 
Since 2011, when Kampala Capital City Authority (KCCA) replaced the defunct Kampala City Council (KCC), traders have been labouring to regain control of markets and market land.

From Nakesero market to Owino, Old Tax Park, traders are entangled in deep seated conflicts over ownership, eviction threats and struggles to acquire land titles among others. Almost, all these markets are saddled in litigations. 
 
Explaining the philosophy of markets, Museveni likened them to nurseries, where traders start horning their business skills. And when they feel, they have graduated from informal trading; Museveni argued traders leave market stalls to other people who want to join. He reiterated several times selling these markets, was a big mistake. 

Nb

What sort of African economics is this that governments subsidise middlemen traders(retailers and wholesalers) in a market system? In many modern national and international markets the internet is becoming the go between the product and the consumer. Even the uneducated Ugandan President, Idi Amin understood such a simple economic principle and had to regulate the Asian traders.

 

 

 

 

 

Museveni donates Shs 500m to taxi operators:

October 5, 2018

Written by URN

Some of the traders dressed in Bazukulu ba Museveni  T-shirts at Nakasero market

Some of the traders dressed in Bazukulu ba Museveni T-shirts at Nakasero market

 

President Yoweri Museveni has donated Shs 500 million to Old Taxi Park Taxi Operators Association. Museveni who is touring and addressing mini rallies in downtown Kampala announced the donation as he addressed the taxi operators.
 
He promised to donate Shs 10 million to each small association once documents are submitted to his office. The rally at the Old Taxi Park was the second following another at Nakasero market on Friday morning.

Museveni also donated Shs 100 million to the Nakasero Market Main Sacco and promised to give each small Sacco in the area Shs 10 million.
 
He is scheduled to visit Owino market, Kiseka market and disabled traders market among others. Museveni key message to traders is that they had abandoned him by deciding to vote opposition politicians.

He promised to help the traders reclaim their market land, which had earlier been sold by the defunct Kampala City Council officials. Lately, Museveni has been in an avalanche of dishing out cash to poor city youth who seem to form the core of Kyadondo East MP Robert Kyagulanyi support base. 

 

89.2